3D Hubs and Protolabs join forces to create the world’s most comprehensive manufacturing portfolio
3D printing vs. CNC machining
Written by Alkaios Bournias Varotsis
CNC machining is a common subtractive manufacturing technology. Unlike 3D printing, the process typically begins with a solid block of material (blank) and removes material to achieve the required final shape, using a variety of sharp rotating tools or cutters.
CNC is one of the most popular methods of manufacturing for both small one-off jobs and medium to high volume production. It offers excellent repeatability, high accuracy and a wide range of materials and surface finishes.
Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3D Printing processes build parts by adding material one layer at a time. AM processes require no special tooling or fixtures, so initial setup costs are kept to a minimum.
In this article, we present the key technology considerations to help you choose the right technology for your application. We focus on functional parts and prototypes made from metals or plastics. The 3D printing processes that are most suitable for this purpose are SLS or FDM for plastics and SLM/DMLS or Binder Jetting for metals.
Selecting the right technology
When choosing between CNC and Additive Manufacturing (AM), there are a few simple guidelines that can be applied to the decision making process.
As a rule of thumb, all parts that can be manufactured with limited effort through a subtractive process should generally be CNC machined. It usually only makes sense to use 3D printing in the following cases:
- When traditional methods are not able to produce the part, for example for highly complex, topology-optimized geometries.
- When a fast turn-around time is critical; 3D printed parts can be delivered within 24h.
- When low-cost is essential; for small volumes, 3D printing is generally cheaper than CNC.
- When there is a small number of identical parts required (less than 10).
- When materials are required that cannot be easily machined, like metal superalloys or flexible TPU.
CNC offers greater dimensional accuracy and produces parts with better mechanical properties in all 3 dimensions, but this usually comes at a greater cost, especially when volumes are small.
If higher part quantities are needed, (hundreds or more), then neither CNC nor AM may be cost-competitive option. Traditional forming technologies, such as investment casting or injection molding, are generally the most economic option, due to mechanisms of economies of scale (see figure).
Recommended process reference table
|No. of parts||1's||10’s||100’s||1000’s|
|Plastic||3D Printing||3D Printing(consider: CNC)||CNC(consider: Injection Molding)||Injection Molding|
|Metal||3D Printing & CNC*||CNC(consider: 3D Printing)||CNC(consider: Investment Casting)||Investment or Die Casting|
Curious about the cost for CNC machining and 3D Printing? Upload your CAD files to an instant quote now!
Dimensional accuracyCNC machining offers tight tolerance and excellent repeatability. Very large to very small parts can be CNC machined accurately. Due to the shape of the cutting tool, internal corners will always have a radius, but external surfaces can have sharp edges and can be machined very thin. Different 3D printing systems offer different dimensional accuracy. Industrial machines can produce parts with very good tolerances. If tight clearances are required, the critical dimensions can be 3D printed oversized and then machined during post processing. The minimum wall thickness of 3D printed parts is restricted by the size of the end effector (for example to nozzle diameter in FDM or the laser spot size in SLS). Since parts are fabricated one layer at a time, layer lines might be visible, especially at curved surfaces. The maximum part size is relatively small, as 3D printing processing often require close environmental control.
|Tolerance||Min. wall thickness||Maximum part size|
|CNC||± 0.025 - 0.125 mm *||0.75 mm||Milling: 2000 x 800 x 1000 mm Lathe: Ø 500 mm|
|SLS||± 0.300 mm||0.7 - 1.0 mm||300 x 300 x 300 mm|
|FDM||Industrial: ± 0.200 mm Desktop: ± 0.500 mm||0.8 - 1.0 mm||Industrial: 900 x 600 x 900 mm Desktop: 200 x 200 x 200 mm|
|SLM/DMLS||± 0.100 mm||0.40 mm||230 x 150 x 150 mm|
|Binder Jetting||± 0.200 mm||2.0 mm||380 x 355 x 735 mm|
* : According to the specified level of tolerance.
CNC is mainly used for machining metals. It can also be used for machining thermoplastics, acrylics, softwoods and hardwoods, modeling foams and machining wax.
- Great mechanical and thermal properties with fully isotropic behaviour.
- Dimensional restrictions due to blank size (using a non-standard blank size will increase the cost).
|Common CNC materials|
|Plastics||ABS, Nylon, Polycarbonate, PEEK|
|Metals||Aluminum, Stainless Steel, Titanium, Brass|
3D Printing is predominately used with plastics and to a lesser extent for metals. Some technologies can produce parts from ceramics, wax, sand, and composites. 3D printing materials is a complex topic that is discussed further in dedicated articles of the Knowledge Base.
- Wide variety of materials with a wide range of physical properties.
- Materials that are difficult to machine (such TPU and metal superalloys) can be 3D printed.
- May have lesser mechanical properties compared to CNC parts (they are typically not fully isotropic).
|Common 3D printing materials|
|Plastics||Nylon, PLA, ABS, ULTEM, ASA, TPU|
|Metals||Aluminium, Stainless Steel, Titanium, Inconel|
There are a number of limitations that must be considered when designing parts for CNC machining, including tool access and clearances, hold or mount points, as well as the inability to machine square corners due to tool geometry.
Some geometries are impossible to CNC machine (even with 5-axis CNC systems) as the tool cannot access all the surfaces of a component. Most geometries require the rotation of the part to access the different sides. Repositioning adds to the processing and labor time and custom jigs and fixtures may be required, affecting the final price.
3D printing has very few geometry restrictions compared to CNC. Support structures are required in most technologies, like FDM or SLM/DMLS, and are removed during post processing.
Plastic freeform, organic geometries can be easily manufactured with polymer-based powder bed fusion processes, such as SLS or Multi Jet Fusion (MJF), as they require no support. The ability to produce highly complex geometries is one of the key strengths of 3D printing.
Here's what happens behind the scene when placing a CNC or 3D printing order:
In CNC, an expert operator or engineer has to first consider tool selection, spindle speed, cutting path and repositioning of the part. These factors all greatly impact the final part quality and build time. The manufacturing process is labor intensive, as the black has to be manually set up in the machine. After machining, the components are ready for use or post-processing.
In 3D printing, the machine operator first prepares the digital file (chooses orientation and adds support) and then sends it to the machine, where it is printed with little human intervention. When printing is complete, the part needs to be cleaned and post-processed, which is the most labor-intensive aspect of the 3D printing manufacturing workflow.
A number of post-processing methods can be applied to both CNC and 3D printed parts that improve the functionality or aesthetics of the as-built component. The most common post-processing techniques are listed below:
|Post processing methods|
|CNC||Bead blasting, anodizing (type II or type III), powder coating|
|3D printing||Media blasting, sanding and polishing, micro-polishing, metal plating|
Case study: prototyping a plastic enclosure
While designing a new electronic appliance, fabricating prototypes for the enclosure is key for finalizing the product before mass manufacture. To accelerate the development time, fast lead time and low cost are the main objectives.
CNC and SLS can be used to create prototypes of high accuracy and aesthetic appeal, but desktop FDM has much shorter lead time and lower cost. Since mechanical performance is not the main objective of this project, the benefits of CNC and SLS are usually not worth the extra cost and time.
|Common materials||ABS, Nylon||PLA, ABS, Nylon||Nylon|
|Lead time||1 - 2 weeks||1 - 3 days||Less than a week|
|Accuracy||± 0.125 mm||± 0.500 mm||± 0.300 mm|
Case study: manufacturing metal brackets and components
Metal brackets and other mechanical components can bear high loads and operate at elevated temperatures. In this case, dimensional accuracy and good material properties are the main objectives.
If the model geometry is simple (like the components of the image above), then CNC is the best option it terms of accuracy, mechanical properties and cost.
When the geometric complexity increases or when more exotic materials are required, metal 3D printing must be considered. Components optimized for weight and strength (like the brackets of the image below) have organic structures that are very difficult and costly to machine.
CNC and metal 3D printing can be combined to manufacture parts with both organic shape and very tight tolerances at the critical locations.
|Common materials||Aluminum Stainless Steel Brass||Stainless Steel Aluminum Titanium Inconel Cobalt-Chrome||Stainless Steel Inconel Cobalt-Chrome Tungsten carbide|
|Accuracy||± 0.025 mm||± 0.100 mm||± 0.200 mm|
|Mechanical properties||Very good||Very good||Good|
Rules of thumb
Selecting the right technology for your application is crucial and can be boiled down to the following rules of thumb:
- CNC maching is best suited for medium to high quantities (less that 250-500 parts) and relatively simple geometries.
- 3D printing is generally best for low quantities (or one-off prototypes) and complex geometries.
- When considering metals, CNC can be price competitive even for low quantities, but geometry limitations still apply.
- When quantities are high (more than 250 - 500 parts) other forming technologies are more suitable.