Filemon

Filemon's picture
Filemon
@Filemon
Member since

October 2013

46
Posts
#6
873
Comments
#3
862
Upvotes
#2
Hub Badges
Fairphone
Ultimaker
Christmas Marvin
Printer Guide Reviewer
Printer Guide Reviewer 2017

View my Hub
Followed tags

1 year 3 months ago - Commented on Faberdashery print settings UM2

+1
0
-1

thanks @gregh, Indeed I also noticed that my 'standard PLA' temperatures seemed to be too low and my speed to high. I will go with your recommendations, as well as the above, and check back in with more detail afterwards. Cheers!

1 year 3 months ago - Commented on Faberdashery print settings UM2

1 year 3 months ago - Commented on Faberdashery print settings UM2

+1
0
-1

Thx! This is what I needed to start off from, cheers!

1 year 3 months ago - Posted a new Thread

Hi all, it's been a while, but I just bought some Faberdashery filament again to play with. However I have trouble getting it to print well on my UM2. Does anybody have some general recommendation for settings? Nozzle = 0.4

1 year 3 months ago - Commented on Marvin Solidworks/Original Model

+1
0
-1

I'll get back to this later with the file ;)

1 year 3 months ago - Commented on FDM Hubs, I need your input

+1
0
-1

We're still testing the first few articles and will 'officially' launch in a few months :)

1 year 4 months ago - Commented on Can we finally follow a more conventional sorting system?

+1
0
-1

Ok great, glad to hear the first part is sorted.

 

About variability. I guess you can capture a lot of the distance variation with different specified shipping options (dedicated to regions). Weight is a bit more tricky. However, the majority of prints is below 1kg. For very big prints you should have a bit more margin to play with. If an order is really massive, I recon the customer will understand special shipping is needed. For me, that has worked so far.

 

Cheers!

1 year 4 months ago - Commented on Can we finally follow a more conventional sorting system?

+1
5
-1

Hello fellow Hubs,

 

Thanks for the comments, some good ideas which I'll feedback to the product team. I also understand the concerns, so allow me to quickly elaborate;

 

  • The shipping service update being discussed here is only about transit time, from shipping to delivery. So print quality in relation to overall turn-around is not part of this update.  
  • The default sorting is "Best Match" which takes into account many different aspects of being a Hub (more here). 
  • We do plan to allow customers to choose to sort by "Delivery" time as well, next to "Best match" and "Distance". But we’re not replacing the Best Match ranking in the checkout. Sorting by price is also on the roadmap.
  • It's true that some customers are not sensitive to turn-around time but more to price or service, they can keep using the "Best Match" sorting and later on sort by "Price".
  • Finally, in order to keep 3D Hubs competitive and grow the platform, and driving more orders to Hubs, we have to keep adding new services. One heavily requested service by customers is fast shipping. 

 

Hope that explains. Please let me know if any questions remain.

Best,

Filemon

1 year 4 months ago - Commented on 12.5% I think this is a Great Value for for the Services I receive Warning Rant is in Progress LOL DOT COMS .coms should cease to exist on 3dhubs :(

+1
2
-1

Hi guys, allow me to jump in on this as well. @Iceman24k thanks a lot for your post, got me thinking. I will bring it up here at HQ and explore if there's possibilities for us to supply the community with 'flagging' functionality that is fair and effective. Will get back to that. For now, thanks again!

1 year 4 months ago - Commented on Hubs Perks not working

Pages